![]() Using it side by side with the ST8000, copy isĪbout 15 to 20% less than the 8000, more notably in weak signal and QRMĬonditions. To 25%, usually not enough to be intelligible. Under weak signal conditions the copy is 15 ![]() ST8000 is a solid and stable design using the best hardware technology Second behind RITTY, because of 10 to 15% less copy than RITTY. As this hardware is my standard, I rate it Has selectable FM or AM hard limiting in QRM and QSB conditions. WIN98SE, I do not know about RITTY's operation in ME or W2K. Writelog as a modem, or for rag chew in a DOS window. It is a state of the art DSP program for $100 that can be used in ![]() Signals areįrequently seen in the DSP waterfall, that are barely, or not audible. S-meter movement and barely audible or not audible audio, it will copyĤ0 to 50%.enough to get serial numbers, calls, etc. ![]() It requires an ISA slot and works 100% with a plain SB16 ItĬopies 10 to 15% more than the Hal ST8000 in weak signal conditions, and Number 1): RITTY by K6STI ( ) is the best rtty program. Side comparisons using a Hal ST8000 modem as the standard. I use WriteLog/Rttyrite in several combinations. Grant, W4OJC replied with his opinions in this informative email: I wonder if anybody had made some tests between all popular hardware and The topic got started again recently when Goran, S55OO asked: Rtty Receive comparisons, RTTY Receive Comparisons
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |